As a mathematics teacher I am very interested in transforming my classroom to a blended learning environment and found this article to help convince me it is the way to go. This article compared fractional computation and problem solving in 335 middle school students with disabilities who exhibited low performance in math. Some were taught in the business as usual (BAU) approach while others were taught in the blended learning approach which they described as enhanced anchored instruction (EAI). The blended learning approach proved to perform better. The study focused on fractions and problem solving because they were the most missed topics on standardized tests for students.
The five EAI units included computer-based interactive lessons, video-based anchored problems, and hands-on applied projects. They covered the topics of ratios, number systems, probability and stats, and geometry. The article went into much detail as to the implementation of each of these EAI methods. I found it quite interesting how the methods all focused on content that was related to a specific word problem based situation and open-ended question and was delved deep into for multiple days. The business as usual approach spent only a couple of days on a particular topic until they moved on to the next concept without delving deep into the idea.
The article goes on describing the tests and results in detail and concluded that students receiving EAI instruction outperformed BAU students in 3 of the 4 tests. They concluded that professional development for teachers is key in making these strategies work and students need to know both the how and why of computing.
I liked how this article took a very challenging population in their study and pushed them to take assessments that involved no calculator. At first glance many teachers would probably think no way that these students could do it and lo and behold they were able to with a lot of work through the different type of instructional strategy. I was also very encouraged to work on spending the time to create more blended learning type of activities for my students to see how much more improvement can be made. I believe students have become so media and device focused as of late that instead of trying to take it away from the students, why don't we try and show them how to use it a much more effective way and enhance their learning because of it.
The five EAI units included computer-based interactive lessons, video-based anchored problems, and hands-on applied projects. They covered the topics of ratios, number systems, probability and stats, and geometry. The article went into much detail as to the implementation of each of these EAI methods. I found it quite interesting how the methods all focused on content that was related to a specific word problem based situation and open-ended question and was delved deep into for multiple days. The business as usual approach spent only a couple of days on a particular topic until they moved on to the next concept without delving deep into the idea.
The article goes on describing the tests and results in detail and concluded that students receiving EAI instruction outperformed BAU students in 3 of the 4 tests. They concluded that professional development for teachers is key in making these strategies work and students need to know both the how and why of computing.
I liked how this article took a very challenging population in their study and pushed them to take assessments that involved no calculator. At first glance many teachers would probably think no way that these students could do it and lo and behold they were able to with a lot of work through the different type of instructional strategy. I was also very encouraged to work on spending the time to create more blended learning type of activities for my students to see how much more improvement can be made. I believe students have become so media and device focused as of late that instead of trying to take it away from the students, why don't we try and show them how to use it a much more effective way and enhance their learning because of it.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.library.aurora.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfvie
wer?vid=8&sid=2935711d-5627-410c-9766-aa05cc037cad%40sessionmgr4006
wer?vid=8&sid=2935711d-5627-410c-9766-aa05cc037cad%40sessionmgr4006
Bottge, B.A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M.D., Butler, M., & Cho, S. (2014). Effects of
Blended Instructional Models on Math Performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4),
423-437. doi:10.1177/0014402914527240